<ins class='dcmads' style='display:inline-block;width:728px;height:90px'
data-dcm-placement='N46002.3910832MAHOGANYREVUE/B29181624.356591058'
data-dcm-rendering-mode='iframe'
data-dcm-https-only
data-dcm-gdpr-applies='gdpr=${GDPR}'
data-dcm-gdpr-consent='gdpr_consent=${GDPR_CONSENT_755}'
data-dcm-addtl-consent='addtl_consent=${ADDTL_CONSENT}'
data-dcm-ltd='false'
data-dcm-resettable-device-id=''
data-dcm-app-id=''>
<script src='https://www.googletagservices.com/dcm/dcmads.js'></script>
</ins>
In a post on X, Sen. Scott Wiener condemned the investigation into Rep. Ilhan Omar after reports found that the Trump administration is aiming to strip her of U.S. citizenship and deport her. Federal agents investigating Omar are focused on potential immigration fraud, citizenship papers, and historical family paperwork.
BREAKING
Trump’s Homeland Security secretary promised “something is going to happen” to Ilhan Omar, and now ICE agents have RAIDED her home without filing a SINGLE charge.
Trump’s Homeland Security secretary promised “something is going to happen” to Ilhan Omar, and now ICE agents have RAIDED her home without filing a SINGLE charge.Agents from Homeland Security Investigations, ICE’s investigative arm, started searching Rep. Ilhan Omar’s Washington home around 6 a.m. Monday. The Justice Department says they had a judge-approved warrant and calls it part of an “ongoing federal criminal investigation.” The department didn’t name her or give any other details. No charges have been filed.
Anonymous sources say the probe is about immigration paperwork her late father filled out when she was a child. Omar, 44, came to the U.S. as a child refugee from Somalia’s civil war and later became a citizen.
“I’m ok,” she wrote hours later. She called the raid “an attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement.” Then she added: “I will not be silenced.”
Omar is on the ballot November 3. Xochitl Hinojosa, who used to run public affairs at the Justice Department, said the department has a longstanding rule that “you don’t take overt actions like this before an election.” She said that applies most of all when a candidate is on the ballot.
JD Vance has accused Omar of immigration fraud without offering any evidence. In a podcast interview, he described talking with Stephen Miller about building a case against her: “How do you go after her? How do you investigate her? How do you actually do the thing?”
In September, border czar Tom Homan said Omar was under criminal investigation. Omar said Homeland Security had never even contacted her. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said “something is going to happen.”
Trump has called her “garbage” and spent years spreading the baseless claim that she married her brother. “Throw her the hell out,” he said. The search reportedly has nothing to do with that claim.
Omar says she and her family have gotten death threats because of Trump’s rhetoric. Last month, a Minnesota man was sentenced to 14 months in prison for spraying her with vinegar at a January town hall.
Her office said in a statement: “The Congresswoman has done nothing wrong.”
If you appreciate my posts, it would mean the world if you followed my page. Thank you for being here.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
*****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Three weeks before she faces reelection, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home was raided Monday by the Trump regime as part of an ongoing criminal fraud probe into immigration paperwork filed when she was a child, according to the Justice Department. The Somali-born congresswoman, a U.S. citizen since 2000, has long faced accusations—amplified by President Trump and allies—that she committed fraud, including claims she married a brother to aid his immigration. Snopes calls that claim “unfounded,” finding no substantive evidence. MAGA keeps spreading it regardless. Omar has called Trump’s focus on her an “unhealthy and creepy obsession.” No charges have been filed; denaturalization requires a high burden of proof in court.
Many are wondering: if this is about immigration status and not politics, where is the investigation into Elon Musk? A 2024 Washington Post investigation found that Musk worked without authorization in the mid-1990s after failing to enroll at Stanford while on a student visa, citing former associates, a 2005 email in which he wrote he had “no legal right to stay in the country,” and investor concerns. Musk has denied illegality, stating he held a J-1 that transitioned to an H-1B. Experts told Wired that if he misrepresented this on later forms, it could theoretically support denaturalization under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 for concealment of a material fact—though such decades-old cases are rare and difficult.
Republicans lean heavily on Elon Musk’s unprecedented financial support—over $276 million since July alone, including a record $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund and tens of millions more to his America PAC. This midterm “rescue” funding, exceeding his 2024 totals, plus his control of X, makes him a critical lifeline for the Republican Party.
Equal application of immigration law would examine documented questions about both. Political targeting of Omar while ignoring Musk undermines any claim of neutral enforcement.
English 
